User Obsession: Why Most Teams Build What Users Don't Want

The Problem: Assumption-Driven Development

Here's what we see repeatedly: companies launch products based on internal logic that makes perfect sense in conference rooms but falls apart when real users get involved.

‍

A fintech startup builds a complex dashboard because "users want comprehensive analytics." Users actually want to check their balance in three taps. An e-commerce platform adds social features because "engagement drives retention." Users abandon the platform because checkout now takes twice as long.

‍

The pattern is always the same. Teams substitute their assumptions for user research, then wonder why adoption rates disappoint and churn remains high.

‍

The business cost is measurable. Products built on assumptions require expensive pivots, feature rollbacks, and extended development cycles to fix fundamental misalignments with user needs.

What User Obsession Actually Means

User Obsession means understanding what users actually need and prioritizing their success over internal convenience. It's a decision-making framework that resolves the most common conflict in product development: building what's easy versus building what's valuable.

This isn't about blindly following every user request. Users often can't articulate their underlying needs, and individual feedback doesn't represent broader patterns. User Obsession means understanding the problems users are trying to solve, then building solutions that address those problems effectively.

‍

What it means in practice:

Validate assumptions with real user feedback before committing development resources. Every feature hypothesis gets tested with actual users before engineering begins significant work.

‍

Measure success by user behavior, not feature completion. Adoption rates, retention metrics, and user-reported outcomes matter more than shipping deadlines.

‍

Choose solutions that reduce user friction, even when they require more development effort. If users struggle with a workflow, fix the workflow rather than training users to adapt.